The news of Trustwave's severe malpractice sparked demands for removing the Trustwave root certificates from the Mozilla trust stores (Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey). The demand was filed as a bug in Bugzilla and the issue has also gotten a fair amount of attention on the Mozilla-dev-security-policy mailing list.
We experienced the same process – Bugzilla + mailing list outbursts – during the recent DigiNotar and Comodo scandals.
Kill or Not to Kill, That's the Question
According to Trustwave they had to sell the man-in-the-middle certificate since other CAs do it. That in itself is extremely worrying. These bastards who've been charging us $$$ for maintaining trust on the Internet. They've not only been negligent in their security operations but also done business selling out the trust built in by all browsers.
So, should Mozilla kill the Trustwave root because of their misconduct? Tricky question.
On the one hand I feel Trustwave's CA business deserves nothing less than the ditch. They did the wrong thing with open eyes.
On the other hand we probably have a large scale problem at our hand – CAs worldwide have been issuing subCA certs that allow employers, governments, and agencies to intercept the traffic we all thought was authenticated, encrypted, and integrity checked. Killing the Trustwave root doesn't fix that.
Think about it. The whole trust model crumbles. Can customers now claim someone else must have manipulated their buy order for the stock that later plummeted? Can payment providers who leak credit cards now claim somebody must have MItMed them? Will the increase in online shopping continue once mainstream media understands and writes about this issue?
Whichever path we take it has to lead to reestablished trust in the CA model. The alternatives such as building on DNSSEC or Moxie's excellent Convergence are nowhere near mainstream roll-out.
But you know what? Democracy and openness seem to work. Mozilla has made the right decision.
CAs world-wide have until April 27 to come clean. Mozilla says the following on its security blog:
"Earlier today we sent an email to all certificate authorities in the Mozilla root program to clarify our expectations around certificate issuance. In particular, we made it clear that the issuance of subordinate CA certificates for the purposes of SSL man-in-the-middle interception or traffic management is unacceptable. We made it clear that this practice remains unacceptable even when the intended deployment of such a certificate is restricted to a closed network.
In addition to this clarification, we have made several requests. We have requested that any such certificates be revoked, and their HSMs destroyed. We have requested the serial numbers of those certificates and fingerprints of their signing roots so that we, and other relying parties, can detect and distrust these subCA certificates if encountered. We have requested that any CAs who have issued subCA certificates fulfill these requests no later than April 27, 2012."
Where else did you see such a clear message to the CAs who have abused our trust? Mozilla makes me proud.
We Need a Free Browser, Not Only an Open Source Browser
The handling of Comodo, DigiNotar and Trustwave tells me we truly need Mozilla and Firefox. Nowhere else in the web community have I seen such openness, freedom of speech, and focus on regular users' interests. Hey, even internet trolls get their say on the mailing list :).
Sure, I love my Chrome, I know Google is a high-paying partner to Mozilla, and I know Firefox has been lagging behind in performance and developer tools. But there's something really great and important in a free alternative.
- Chrome v17.0.963.56: 280.8 ms
- Firefox v10.0.2: 233.0 ms
Therefore I would like to urge the Mozilla Foundation to get us tab sandboxing and silent auto-upgrades in Firefox so I can go all-in!
We need a free browser, not just an open source browser.